Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

STAY GRANTED BY HIGH COURT ADJUDICATING AUTHORITY RAISED SAME DEMAND

gunda ashok kumar

SIR,

HIGH COURT ALREADY HAS GRANTED STAY AND ADJUDICATING AUTHORITY HAS RAISED THE DEMAND ON WHICH HIGH COURT STAY ORDER AND PASSED ADJUDICATING ORDERS WHICH SUSTAINABLE IN THE EYES OF LAW

High Court Stay Ignored? Concerns Raised Over Demand Issued by Adjudicating Authority, Potential Contempt of Court Cited. A query was raised regarding a situation where a High Court granted a stay on a demand, yet the adjudicating authority issued the same demand, raising concerns about the legality of such actions. One respondent questioned whether the stay was related to the querist's own case. Another highlighted that if the issue, period, and parties are identical, it could constitute contempt of court and judicial indiscipline, referencing a Supreme Court case. A third respondent found the information insufficient for further comment, while a fourth noted the querist's apparent indifference. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues