Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID : 119179
- 0 -

Auto populated ITC in Annual Return colmn 8A

Date 26 Jun 2024
Replies2 Answers
Views 530 Views
Asked By

One of my client has been served a notice with the issue of excess availment of Input Tax Credit for the period 2018-19. The GSTR-2A of the tax-payer reflecting ITC of Rs.9407542/- while the 8A column of annual return GSTR-9 reflect an ITC of Rs. 10066878/-. The department has taken the ITC available in 2A for calculating differences in ITC availed and ITC available. While considering the ITC in 8A of GSTR-9 there is no differences found. How to reply to the show cause notice issued?

2 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
- 0
Replied on Jun 27, 2024
1.

Bring out this fact and mention that there is no excess availment.

Additionally, bring out grounds regarding GSTR-2A not relevant for availing of credit for 2018-19, the rule itself was existent from Oct '19. 

- 0
Replied on Jun 27, 2024
2.

cnt has  to justify his  correct availment of ITC with the books of account maintained. The books of account are a statutory records and hence the department cannot deny ITC.

You can take shelter of the following High Court judgement. The period involved is prior to the introduction of GSTR-2A

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Issues