Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Auto populated ITC in Annual Return colmn 8A

Sudhir Kumar

One of my client has been served a notice with the issue of excess availment of Input Tax Credit for the period 2018-19. The GSTR-2A of the tax-payer reflecting ITC of Rs.9407542/- while the 8A column of annual return GSTR-9 reflect an ITC of Rs. 10066878/-. The department has taken the ITC available in 2A for calculating differences in ITC availed and ITC available. While considering the ITC in 8A of GSTR-9 there is no differences found. How to reply to the show cause notice issued?

Discrepancy in 2018-19 ITC Claim: GSTR-2A Vs. GSTR-9; Justify with Statutory Books and Court Judgment A client received a notice regarding excess Input Tax Credit (ITC) claimed for 2018-19, with a discrepancy between the GSTR-2A and GSTR-9 forms. The GSTR-2A shows ITC of Rs. 9,407,542, while the GSTR-9 shows Rs. 10,066,878. Respondents advised highlighting that there was no excess availment and that GSTR-2A was not applicable for the 2018-19 period. It was suggested to justify the ITC claimed with statutory books of account and reference a relevant High Court judgment, as the rule involving GSTR-2A was introduced after the period in question. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Shilpi Jain on Jun 27, 2024

Bring out this fact and mention that there is no excess availment.

Additionally, bring out grounds regarding GSTR-2A not relevant for availing of credit for 2018-19, the rule itself was existent from Oct '19. 

KASTURI SETHI on Jun 27, 2024

cnt has  to justify his  correct availment of ITC with the books of account maintained. The books of account are a statutory records and hence the department cannot deny ITC.

You can take shelter of the following High Court judgement. The period involved is prior to the introduction of GSTR-2A

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues