Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with ' ' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: ' ' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

WhatsApp Join Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
From To
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 118969
Like 0 Bookmark

Penalty u/s 129 and 130, Section 17(5)(i)

Date 07 Feb 2024
Replies 11 Replies
Views 6496 Views
Input Tax Credit availability: amendment treating detention penalty as non tax may permit ITC, affecting denial rules.
Amendment narrowed the transit detention/confiscation levy to a penalty or fine, distinct from tax on supply; therefore such penalty may fall outside the input tax credit denial, although where detention/confiscation leads to a separate tax demand under general assessment provisions the denial rule may still apply. Practitioners differ: some treat the provisions as interwoven so that subsequent tax demands trigger credit denial, while others view the penalty as non tax and thus not subject to the credit denial, subject to factual determination whether tax was in fact paid during enforcement. (AI Summary)

Dear Sir/Madam

Please respond to my query

Thanks in advance

After amendment of Section 129 now penalty is only needed to be paid for release of goods and conveyance - and tax is to be paid along with GSTR-3B. So 17(5)(i) says tax paid in accordance with Sec 74, 129, 130 - ITC is not available - so now 17(5)(i) is not applicable in case of sec 129? Means we can take ITC.

And in sec 130 the word tax is not there, nowhere said to pay tax - means 17(5)(i) doesn't apply here. If yes then why it sec 130 included in 17(5)(i).

Is my understanding correct.

11 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide

No Replies are present.

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Issues