Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

ITC impact of FOC replacement of Imported machinery

ROHIT GOEL

Dear experts,

One of our client imported a machinery in Nov 2023 and paid IGST and custom duty and claimed ITC of IGST. The machine developed a critical problem due to which the manufacturer has agreed to replace the machine free of cost and now client shall have to pay IGST and custom duty again at time of import of FOC Machine.

The supplier has asked client to dispose the faulty machinery and it shall be sold at salvage value of about 10% of purchase cost. My question is whether ITC reversal would be needed to be made as per section 18(6) on balance 90%?

If not, kindly cite relevant provisions/circulars etc.

Client Faces ITC Reversal on 90% of Faulty Machinery Under Section 18(6); Consider Keeping for Five Years to Avoid. A client imported machinery in November 2023, paid IGST and customs duty, and claimed ITC on IGST. The machinery developed a critical issue, and the manufacturer agreed to replace it free of cost. The client will need to pay IGST and customs duty again for the replacement. The faulty machine will be sold at salvage value, about 10% of its purchase cost. The query concerns whether ITC reversal is required on the remaining 90% under Section 18(6). The response suggests that Section 18(6) applies and recommends keeping the machine for up to five years to bypass this provision. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues