Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Interest on reversal on non payment to vendors within 180days

DAMINI TALWAR

We have received an inward supply invoice in April 2022, but we could not make payment to the vendor within 180 days neither we have reversed the ITC on non payment within time limit.

However payment is made to vendors after 250 days of issue of invoice.

Interest should be calculated from which date to which date. Pls give section and rule reference for the same.

Discussion on Interest for Delayed Vendor Payments Under GST: Section 16(2), Rule 37, and Section 50 Debated A participant in a discussion forum raised a query about calculating interest on delayed payments to vendors under GST rules, specifically when payment is not made within 180 days, and ITC is not reversed timely. Responses referenced Section 16(2) and Rule 37, indicating interest starts after the 180-day period. One respondent argued that interest under Section 50 might not apply, citing changes in Rule 37 and the distinction between non-payment and failure to pay. The discussion included interpretations of legal provisions and emphasized that these views are not professional advice. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues