Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Interest in DRC 07

SANTOSH PATIL

Sir, If in DRC 01 tax is mentioned and interest as per applicable rate u/s 50 then can department demand interest in DRC-07 Order or they had to quantify interest amount in SCN DRC 01

Debate on Interest Calculation in GST: Can DRC-07 Include Interest if Not in DRC-01? Sections 75(7) & 75(9) Explained. A discussion on a forum revolves around the issue of interest quantification in the context of Goods and Services Tax (GST) in India. A query was raised about whether interest should be quantified in the DRC-07 order if mentioned in DRC-01. One participant argues that interest cannot be quantified in advance since it is calculated up to the tax payment date. Another cites sections 75(7) and 75(9) of the GST Act, explaining that interest can be demanded even if not specified in the order. The discussion also touches on the applicability of these sections to cases of incorrect Input Tax Credit (ITC) utilization and erroneous tax refunds. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
KASTURI SETHI on Nov 23, 2023

Interest cannot be quantified either in SCN or Order-in-Original inasmuch as interest is to be computed up to the date of payment of tax which was not paid within due time. So the quantification cannot be done in advance. If done, that will not be complete and correct. So the exact amount of interest to be paid can be calculated/ascertained only on the date of payment of tax.

Amit Agrawal on Nov 26, 2023

Section 75(7) reads as follows: The amount of tax, interest and penalty demanded in the order shall not be in excess of the amount specified in the notice and no demand shall be confirmed on the grounds other than the grounds specified in the notice.

Section 75(9) reads as follows: The interest on the tax short paid or not paid shall be payable whether or not specified in the order determining the tax liability.

Padmanathan KV on Nov 26, 2023

Learned friend Amit JI,

Soliciting your views on the following for the benefit of querist and readers:

Section 75(9) is restricted to tax short paid or not paid.

Thus, Section 75(9) does not cover cases of ITC wrongly utilized (as wrongly availed is now dealt by Rule 88B) and tax erroneous refunded. Therefore, due to specific absence of these cases in section 75(9), the quantification of interest in DRC-07 is mandatory for ITC wrongly utilized and tax erroneous refunded? (Also another issue is section 50 does not cover tax erroneous refunded. So the levy of interest itself is in question.)

With respect to the query here, section 75(9) does not mandate quantification of interest in Notice, though section 75(7) requires so. And will it be covered by Section 160(1), if a view is taken that it is mandatory to quantify interest in SCN?

Amit Agrawal on Nov 26, 2023

@ Shri Padmanathan Ji,

W.r.t. your last post, my views are as under:

A. In subject query, there was demand raised for interest u/s 50 in the SCN, though same is not quantified.

B. I think that same is sufficient compliance of Section 75(7) read with Section 160(1).

B1. This is more so, if subject issue under dispute (tax short paid / tax not paid / ITC wrongly availed & utilised, as the case may be) is not paid by the tax-payer before SCN.

P.S. W.r.t. larger issues raised by you specially with regard to Section 75(9), lets deal with them as and when proper query gets presented itself on this TMI forum.

These are ex facie views of mine and the same should not be construed as professional advice / suggestion.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues