Whether employees of Nationalised Banks and Public Sector Undertakings are Government Employees ? And Leave Salary Encashment received by them is fully exempt or exempt upto specified Limit.
Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?
Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?
Whether employees of Nationalised Banks and Public Sector Undertakings are Government Employees ? And Leave Salary Encashment received by them is fully exempt or exempt upto specified Limit.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
In my understanding, employees of Nationalised Banks and PSUs are not treated as Government employees under the Income-tax Act. Accordingly, leave salary encashment received by them at retirement is exempt only up to the specified limit of Rs. 25 lakhs u/s 10(10AA), whereas for Central/State Government employees it is fully exempt.
As per - Kamal Kumar Kalia & Ors. Versus Union Of India & Ors. (2019 (11) TMI 1143 - DELHI HIGH COURT)
Merely because Public Sector Undertaking and Nationalised Banks are considered as ‘State’ under Article 12 of the Constitution of India for the purpose of entrainment of proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution and for enforcement of fundamental right under the Constitution, it does not follow that the employees of such Public Sector Undertaking, Nationalised Banks or other institutions which are classified as ‘State’ assume the status of Central Government and State Government employees. It has been held in multiple decisions that employees of Public Sector Undertakings are not at par with government servants (Ref: Officers & Supervisors of I.D.P.L. v Chairman & M.D. I.D.P.L [2003 (7) TMI 733 - SUPREME COURT].
In the noted case of A.K.Bindal v Union of India [2003 (4) TMI 406 - SUPREME COURT] while considering the issue of revision of the pay scales of employees of government companies/PSUs at par with government employees, it was held that the employees of government companies cannot claim the same legal rights as government employees.
Answer to both queries is in the negative.
Employees of Nationalized Banks (Govt. of India Undertaking) and Public Sector Undertaking are not Govt. employees.
Service Rules of Govt. Bank employees are different from the Services Rules of Central Govt. Employees. Bank Employees are governed by the rules of the bank.
As per - Kamal Kumar Kalia & Ors. Versus Union Of India & Ors. (2019 (11) TMI 1143 - DELHI HIGH COURT)
Merely because Public Sector Undertaking and Nationalised Banks are considered as ‘State’ under Article 12 of the Constitution of India for the purpose of entrainment of proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution and for enforcement of fundamental right under the Constitution, it does not follow that the employees of such Public Sector Undertaking, Nationalised Banks or other institutions which are classified as ‘State’ assume the status of Central Government and State Government employees. It has been held in multiple decisions that employees of Public Sector Undertakings are not at par with government servants (Ref: Officers & Supervisors of I.D.P.L. v Chairman & M.D. I.D.P.L [2003 (7) TMI 733 - SUPREME COURT].
In the noted case of A.K. Bindal v Union of India [2003 (4) TMI 406 - SUPREME COURT] while considering the issue of revision of the pay scales of employees of government companies/PSUs at par with government employees, it was held that the employees of government companies cannot claim the same legal rights as government employees.
The following judgement is also worth-reading :-
Income Tax
2023 (6) TMI 1476 - ITAT JAIPUR - Ram Charan Gupta Versus ITO, Ward-4 (2), Jaipur.
Exemption u/s 10(10AA)(i) - assessee who has retired is a bank employee - CIT(A) rejecting the amount which is earned leave encashment on retirement made by AO - HELD THAT:- Recently the Central Board of Direct Taxes Suo motu revised the limit for deduction u/s 10(10AA) and the revised limit now stood at Rs. 25,00,000 as specified vide Notification No. 31/2023 issued by the ministry of finance.
Since the leave encashment amount as claimed by the assessee which is below the revised limit of leave encashment exempt prescribed by the Board, the assessee is eligible to claim of deduction of said. Based on these observations the ld. AO is directed to allow the claim of the assessee u/s.10(10AA) of the act within the revised limit as prescribed. In terms of these observations the appeal of the assessee is allowed.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.