Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

WhatsAppJoin Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 115429
Like 0Bookmark

PROVISIONAL ATTACHMENT OF PROPERTY.

Date 14 Sep 2019
Replies6 Replies
Views 3752 Views
Delegation of provisional attachment powers to subordinate officers questioned under GST law; such delegations may be open to challenge.
The document raises whether the power to make provisional attachment orders to protect revenue may lawfully be delegated by the commissioner to subordinate proper officers. It notes statutory provisions that empower provisional attachment and permit delegation by notification, records a high-court opinion finding such delegation to subordinate officers indefensible in a particular case, and explains that the opinion did not annul the underlying attachment provision; affected parties may challenge attachments while the revenue may pursue further judicial review. (AI Summary)

Dear Sirs,

Section 83 of the GST Act, 2017 reads as under.

Provisional attachment to protect revenue in certain cases.

83. (1) Where during the pendency of any proceedings under section 62 or section 63 or section 64 or section 67 or section 73 or section 74, if the Commissioner is of the opinion that for the purpose of protecting the interest of the Government revenue, it is necessary so to do, he may, by order in writing attach provisionally any property, including bank account, belonging to the taxable person in such manner as may be prescribed.

(2) Every such provisional attachment shall cease to have effect after the expiry of a period of one year from the date of the order made under sub-section (1).

The question is whether the GST Commissioner, either under CGST or SGCT is authorized to delegate his powers under Section 83 to his subordinate proper officers to provisionally attach the property and Bank account? And what are the relevant provisions to do so?

Kindly enlighten.

With regards to experts & visitors of TMI.

6 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide

No Replies are present.

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Issues