Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with ' ' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: ' ' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

WhatsApp Join Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
From To
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 114260
Like 0 Bookmark

Third party data verification 26AS Vs. ST-3 return for the period 2012-13 no scn department writes letter to deposit differential amount of taxable value on the basis of 26AS

Date 22 Oct 2018
Replies 3 Replies
Views 6456 Views
Limitation on tax demands may bar service tax recovery, but recovery possible if tax was collected from recipients.
Reconciliation shows a mismatch between Form 26AS entries and ST 3 returns for 2012-13 and the department seeks the differential. The operative legal point is whether the demand is time barred: limitation likely applies subject to the statutory definition of the relevant date. Practical steps include reconciling accounts because not all 26AS amounts are taxable, responding to verification notices, reviewing contractual terms about tax inclusivity, and noting that tax actually collected from recipients may still be recoverable. (AI Summary)

Now Service Tax Department is pressing hard for payment of service tax value shown in 26AS under 194C for the period of 2012-13. it is a mis-match of ST-3 return differential amount. 5 years time limit for demand has already been expired. should assessee pay that 2012-13 amount after 5 years though the amount is liability to pay to Govt. exchequer. under third party data verification under section 15A & B asking documents for verification. how they will confirm taxable amount. case seems heat by limitation of time. please guide.

3 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide

No Replies are present.

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Issues