<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Third party data verification 26AS Vs. ST-3 return for the period 2012-13 no scn department writes letter to deposit differential amount of taxable value on the basis of 26AS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=114260</link>
    <description>Reconciliation shows a mismatch between Form 26AS entries and ST 3 returns for 2012-13 and the department seeks the differential. The operative legal point is whether the demand is time barred: limitation likely applies subject to the statutory definition of the relevant date. Practical steps include reconciling accounts because not all 26AS amounts are taxable, responding to verification notices, reviewing contractual terms about tax inclusivity, and noting that tax actually collected from recipients may still be recoverable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2018 16:10:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:55:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Third party data verification 26AS Vs. ST-3 return for the period 2012-13 no scn department writes letter to deposit differential amount of taxable value on the basis of 26AS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=114260</link>
      <description>Reconciliation shows a mismatch between Form 26AS entries and ST 3 returns for 2012-13 and the department seeks the differential. The operative legal point is whether the demand is time barred: limitation likely applies subject to the statutory definition of the relevant date. Practical steps include reconciling accounts because not all 26AS amounts are taxable, responding to verification notices, reviewing contractual terms about tax inclusivity, and noting that tax actually collected from recipients may still be recoverable.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2018 16:10:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=114260</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>