Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Seizure of Principal Manufacturer's Stock Lying at Job Worker's Premises

Vivek Gupta

The Principal Manufacturer (PM) is not registered under the excise laws and its Job Worker agrees to discharge all the related excise liabilities under Notification No 36/2001.

The PM retains the right and title of the stocks both raw materials and finished goods lying at the Job Worker's premises.

However the excise liability on the stock is being discharged by the Job Worker.

If the job worker fails to discharge the excise liability due against the stocks of the PM, then can the Excise Dept seize the stock of the PM lying at the job worker's premises.

Excise Duty Liability: Principal Manufacturer's Stock at Risk if Job Worker Fails to Pay Under Notification No 36/2001 A discussion on the liability of excise duty for a Principal Manufacturer (PM) whose stock is at a Job Worker's premises. The PM is not registered under excise laws, and the Job Worker has agreed to handle the excise liabilities per Notification No 36/2001. If the Job Worker fails to discharge these liabilities, the Excise Department can seize the PM's stock at the Job Worker's premises. The duty arises upon the removal of goods, and proper invoicing is required. The Job Worker can clear goods daily but must pay the excise duty monthly by the 6th of the following month. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
KASTURI SETHI on May 7, 2017

CE dutiability arises at the time of removal of ecisable goods from the factory. In the situation explained by you if the job worker (who is responsible for discharging duty liability) removes the goods in contravention of CE law goods can be seized from the job worker's premises. Goods are not to be removed without proper invoice whether premises belong to job worker or principal manufacturer. However, registration is mandatory for principal manufacturer except for small scale units. They are to follow the procedure laid down in notification nos. 83 & 84/94.

KASTURI SETHI on May 7, 2017

Goods lying in the factory can also be seized but such seizure is not successful because duty is to be discharged at the time of removal from the factory.

Vivek Gupta on May 8, 2017

The job worker is not required to pay duty on every clearance. Removal of goods is done on a daily basis on a proper invoice. But excise duty for that month is paid only once, by 6th of the next month before filing of the return. Hence the job worker can very easily clear goods for the entire month without paying any duty.

KASTURI SETHI on May 8, 2017

Who is to pay CE duty---will write the words "duty payable" on the invoice and also calculate the same. Thus he owns the responsibility to pay duty by due date. Hence it is not without payment of duty. Duty is deferred till the due date fixed.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues