Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Rule 14 of the CENVAT Credit Rules

ASIT ROY

I have a case with CESTAT, E Zone Bench, Kolkata regarding the CENVAT Credit Wrongly taken, where a interest demand has been made by the Adjudication. The case was Call on by the Hon'ble Member of the Bench, but the case has been presently reschedule on 16.09.2016

I need the latest case laws regarding the matter

Party Appeals Dismissal of Wrongful CENVAT Credit Case for 2005-07; CESTAT to Review Procedural Oversights A discussion in a legal forum revolves around a case concerning the wrongful availing of CENVAT credit by a party. The party mistakenly took credit on clearing, forwarding, and port charges during the financial years 2005-06 and 2006-07 but did not utilize it. Although initially waived by the adjudicating authority, the decision was contested by the Commissioner, leading to an appeal. The appeal was dismissed due to procedural oversights, prompting the party to approach the CESTAT, E. Zone Bench, Kolkata. Participants in the forum provide case law references and opinions to assist in the ongoing legal proceedings. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues