Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Liability for Interest on Cenvat Credit Reversed Before Utilization</h1> Issue 1 dealt with liability for interest on wrongly taken cenvat credit reversed before utilization. The Karnataka HC held that interest was not payable ... Chargeability - interest - Cenvat credit wrongly taken - reversed the same before utilization of the credit - Held that:- keeping in view the judgment of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of CCE & ST, LTU Bangalore Vs. M/s. Bill Forge (P) Ltd. [2011 (4) TMI 969 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] and the Larger Bench decision of the Tribunal in the case of J.K Tyre & Industries Ltd., wherein it was held that interest is not to be paid on irregular cenvat credit if the same is reversed before utilization. Therefore, impugned orders are not sustainable. Cenvat credit - input service tax credit on Brokerage and Commission services - appellant providing residential accommodation to ex-pat employees voluntarily and has no direct and indirect relation to the manufacture of final products which are cleared on payment of duty - Held that:- in view of the decision of tribunal in the case of M/s. HEG Ltd. Vs. CCE, Raipur [2010 (6) TMI 306 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI], wherein it has been held that brokerage/commission paid is a business activity and eligible for input service tax credit, the impugned order holding it as a voluntary service and has nothing to do with the business of the appellant is wrong and not sustainable in law. - Decided in favour of appellant with consequential relief Issues:1. Liability for interest on wrongly taken cenvat credit reversed before utilization.2. Entitlement to cenvat credit on input service tax for Brokerage and Commission services.Issue 1: Liability for interest on wrongly taken cenvat credit reversed before utilizationThe appellant filed three appeals questioning the imposition of interest on cenvat credit wrongly taken but reversed before utilization. The audit officials objected to the appellant not paying interest on credit reversed for damaged auto components. The Order-in-Original confirmed the demand for interest. The appellant contended that interest was not payable as the credit was reversed before utilization, citing various judgments. The AR argued that Rule 14 of the Cenvat Credit Rules mandated interest payment even if credit was reversed before use, referring to a Supreme Court judgment. The issue was whether interest was chargeable on wrongly taken cenvat credit even if reversed before utilization. The Karnataka High Court held that interest was not payable if the credit was reversed before utilization. The Tribunal also ruled in favor of not paying interest on irregular cenvat credit if reversed before use. Consequently, the impugned orders were deemed unsustainable, and the appeals were allowed.Issue 2: Entitlement to cenvat credit on input service tax for Brokerage and Commission servicesIn another appeal, the denial of cenvat credit on input service tax for Brokerage and Commission services was contested. The denial was based on the argument that providing residential accommodation to ex-pat employees had no direct relation to the manufacturing of final products. The appellant argued that providing accommodation was obligatory under an arrangement with their overseas joint venture partner. The services were directly linked to the manufacturing activities, as the employees worked in the factory premises. The definition of input service under Rule 2(l) was analyzed to determine eligibility for cenvat credit. The Tribunal's decision in a similar case supported the eligibility of brokerage/commission services for input service tax credit. The impugned order denying the credit on the grounds of voluntariness and lack of business connection was found to be incorrect and unsustainable in law. Consequently, the order denying the cenvat credit on brokerage commission was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.In conclusion, all three appeals were allowed by setting aside the impugned orders, providing consequential relief if necessary.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found