Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Reversal of cenvat

chaganti srinivas

i wish to know, is it mandatory for reversing 10% of the invoice value or can we reverse proportiante cenvat amount involved in the exempted goods without maintaing separate books for both dutiable and exempted clearances.

Exploring Rule 6(3) of CENVAT Credit Rules: Options for Reversing Credit on Exempted Goods Without Separate Books A participant in a discussion forum inquired about the mandatory reversal of 10% of the invoice value for exempted goods under Central Excise, questioning if proportionate CENVAT credit could be reversed without maintaining separate books. Respondents outlined three options: maintaining separate accounts, reversing a fixed percentage of credit, or reversing proportionate credit based on past data, as per Rule 6(3) of the CENVAT Credit Rules. Another participant noted that Rule 6(3A) allows for proportionate credit reversal when separate books aren't maintained. A third respondent mentioned a legal precedent supporting credit reversal as a valid practice. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Brijesh Verma on Apr 6, 2009

Basically there are three options for those assessees who provide both dutiable and exempt goods or services. The first one is maintenance of seprate books. The second one is for reversal of credit as mentioned by you. And the third one relates to reversal of Proportionate Credit on the basis of past years figures. You are advised to go through Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules for further reference which is given by me hereunder: "Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-rules (1) and (2), the manufacturer of goods or the provider of output service, opting not to maintain separate accounts, shall follow either of the following options, as applicable to him, namely:- (i) the manufacturer of goods shall pay an amount equal to ten per cent. of value of the exempted goods and the provider of output service shall pay an amount equal to eight per cent. of value of the exempted services; or (ii) the manufacturer of goods or the provider of output service shall pay an amount equivalent to the CENVAT credit attributable to inputs and input services used in, or in relation to, the manufacture of exempted goods or for provision of exempted services subject to the conditions and procedure specified in sub-rule (3A)."

Guest on Apr 6, 2009

Mr. Brijesh Verma has elaborated the issue nicely. Rule 6(3A) is introduced to make the credit proportionate in case no separate books are maintained. Your purpose would be solved more authentically and correctly by applying rule 6(3A)

Madhukar N Hiregange on Apr 8, 2009

Though Rule 6(3) talks of separate books it ti practically possible for input services ( say telephone) It is clearly impossible. However an old judgement relied on in many recent cases - Chandrapur Magnets lays down that reversal of credit ( along with interest) would amount to not avaiuling the credit. In our opinion this is legally tenable and practicable.

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues