Question framing for references must identify the statutory provision and specify perverse factual findings with evidence. Questions for reference must identify the statutory provision in issue and state the precise legal question. If alleging perversity, the question must pinpoint the perverse factual finding and explain the basis (no evidence, reliance on irrelevant evidence, or neglect of material evidence) and mention that evidence. Questions should avoid unnecessary matters and must not include argumentative material that belongs to hearing submissions.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Question framing for references must identify the statutory provision and specify perverse factual findings with evidence.
Questions for reference must identify the statutory provision in issue and state the precise legal question. If alleging perversity, the question must pinpoint the perverse factual finding and explain the basis (no evidence, reliance on irrelevant evidence, or neglect of material evidence) and mention that evidence. Questions should avoid unnecessary matters and must not include argumentative material that belongs to hearing submissions.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
