Penalty initiation threshold raised; routine penalty proceedings curtailed and pending minor cases to be dropped. Instruction No.1622/CBDT requires that penalty proceedings be initiated only after application of mind and establishment of a prima facie case, with return annotations and other records considered; it increases the administrative de minimis threshold for commencing penalty actions and directs that pending proceedings below that threshold be dropped. Officers must record a footnote when penalty is not pursued, issue self speaking well reasoned orders when penalty is levied, and avoid cyclostyled printed penalty orders.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Penalty initiation threshold raised; routine penalty proceedings curtailed and pending minor cases to be dropped.
Instruction No.1622/CBDT requires that penalty proceedings be initiated only after application of mind and establishment of a prima facie case, with return annotations and other records considered; it increases the administrative de minimis threshold for commencing penalty actions and directs that pending proceedings below that threshold be dropped. Officers must record a footnote when penalty is not pursued, issue self speaking well reasoned orders when penalty is levied, and avoid cyclostyled printed penalty orders.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.