Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Circulars
of of All Circulars
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Incorrect Names in Notices u/s 269D(1) Invalidating Acquisition Proceedings: Board Urges Accurate Verification and Reporting.</h1> The Board has identified issues with acquisition proceedings being invalidated due to incorrect names in notices under section 269D(1). This error often results from reliance on inaccurate reports by Inspectors regarding the names of transferors and transferees. The Board emphasizes the necessity for meticulous verification of details in conveyance deeds by competent authorities before issuing such notices. Inspectors are urged to report facts accurately, and the competent authorities must personally verify these details. This instruction is directed to Inspecting Assistant Commissioners (Acquisition) and Inspectors to ensure compliance and accuracy in future proceedings.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
