Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Bad debt determination: tax officer decides on factual evidence when a bank substantiates irrecoverability. Determination whether a banking receivable is a bad debt and when it became bad is a question of fact for the income-tax officer, not the assessee's unilateral declaration. If a public bank places the facts and evidence showing irrecoverability before the I.T.O., the I.T.O. may take a reasonable view of that material in reaching a finding, subject to appeal. The treatment of audit certificates in this assessment context was considered by the Income-tax Investigation Commission (see paragraph 206).
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Bad debt determination: tax officer decides on factual evidence when a bank substantiates irrecoverability.
Determination whether a banking receivable is a bad debt and when it became bad is a question of fact for the income-tax officer, not the assessee's unilateral declaration. If a public bank places the facts and evidence showing irrecoverability before the I.T.O., the I.T.O. may take a reasonable view of that material in reaching a finding, subject to appeal. The treatment of audit certificates in this assessment context was considered by the Income-tax Investigation Commission (see paragraph 206).
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.