Judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal Nos. 10466-10476 of 2011 in the case of State of Karnataka & Another v. State of Meghalaya & Another upholding the validity of Karnataka Tax on Lotteries Act, 2004 (Karnataka Act No. 4 of 2004) - Instructions for implementation of the said Act with regard to Assessment/ Reassessment/Recovery of taxes etc
📋
Contents
Cases Cited
Referred In
Notifications
Circulars
Forms
Manuals
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Case Laws New
Ref Provisions New
Plus +
Source NTF
Summary
Similar
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
State legislative competence upheld: state tax on lotteries applies to out of state promoters, prompting assessments and recoveries. Supreme Court upheld the Karnataka Tax on Lotteries Act, 2004 as within State legislative competence and deemed effective from 10 December 2003. Assessing authorities must complete pending assessments, rectify or reassess orders that granted exemptions under the earlier High Court Division Bench decision, and recover assessed tax, penalties and other dues. Joint Commissioners must personally monitor compliance, ensure divisional officers identify all connected cases, submit case wise and year wise reports within three months, and use the departmental upload of the Act and promoter list as a non exhaustive reference.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
State legislative competence upheld: state tax on lotteries applies to out of state promoters, prompting assessments and recoveries.
Supreme Court upheld the Karnataka Tax on Lotteries Act, 2004 as within State legislative competence and deemed effective from 10 December 2003. Assessing authorities must complete pending assessments, rectify or reassess orders that granted exemptions under the earlier High Court Division Bench decision, and recover assessed tax, penalties and other dues. Joint Commissioners must personally monitor compliance, ensure divisional officers identify all connected cases, submit case wise and year wise reports within three months, and use the departmental upload of the Act and promoter list as a non exhaustive reference.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.