Confidentiality in anti dumping investigations: dual submissions and good cause justification, with agency discretion on disclosure and hearings. Parties in anti dumping investigations must submit confidential information in two versions: a Confidential set and a Non Confidential Version (NCV) replicating the confidential filing with confidential portions indexed, blanked or summarized. Claims of confidentiality require a good cause statement demonstrating disadvantage from disclosure consistent with the Anti Dumping Agreement criteria. The authority will assess claims case by case, may reject unwarranted confidentiality and disregard un authorized information, and requires advance NCV submission for public hearings; annual accounts are generally non confidential absent detailed justification.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Confidentiality in anti dumping investigations: dual submissions and good cause justification, with agency discretion on disclosure and hearings.
Parties in anti dumping investigations must submit confidential information in two versions: a Confidential set and a Non Confidential Version (NCV) replicating the confidential filing with confidential portions indexed, blanked or summarized. Claims of confidentiality require a good cause statement demonstrating disadvantage from disclosure consistent with the Anti Dumping Agreement criteria. The authority will assess claims case by case, may reject unwarranted confidentiality and disregard un authorized information, and requires advance NCV submission for public hearings; annual accounts are generally non confidential absent detailed justification.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.