Vigilance complaint procedure establishes verification, investigation and disposal timelines to process allegations and enable disciplinary action. Complaints alleging corruption, malpractice or misconduct must be examined by senior officers under CVC guidelines; anonymous or pseudonymous complaints require prima facie verification before administrative action, while complaints with complainant particulars should be verified and treated as pseudonymous if the complainant cannot be contacted. Verifiable complaints trigger comments from concerned functionaries via supervising officers, possible hearings of complainants, and investigation/enquiry; a prima facie case leads to disciplinary or criminal proceedings with competent authority approval. VATO (Vig.) maintains a complaints register and ensures prompt action.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Vigilance complaint procedure establishes verification, investigation and disposal timelines to process allegations and enable disciplinary action.
Complaints alleging corruption, malpractice or misconduct must be examined by senior officers under CVC guidelines; anonymous or pseudonymous complaints require prima facie verification before administrative action, while complaints with complainant particulars should be verified and treated as pseudonymous if the complainant cannot be contacted. Verifiable complaints trigger comments from concerned functionaries via supervising officers, possible hearings of complainants, and investigation/enquiry; a prima facie case leads to disciplinary or criminal proceedings with competent authority approval. VATO (Vig.) maintains a complaints register and ensures prompt action.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.