Judicial review procedure: require self-contained proposals with detailed grounds and strict 30-day filing compliance. Review proposals must be exceptional, founded on detailed comparison of the judgment with records and established practices, and identify overlooked facts or authorities that justify reconsideration. Proposals must be self contained, legible and complete with supporting documents, detailed grounds, and, if delayed, a day to day explanation; timely submission is required to permit Board and Law Ministry processing and legal clearance prior to filing.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Judicial review procedure: require self-contained proposals with detailed grounds and strict 30-day filing compliance.
Review proposals must be exceptional, founded on detailed comparison of the judgment with records and established practices, and identify overlooked facts or authorities that justify reconsideration. Proposals must be self contained, legible and complete with supporting documents, detailed grounds, and, if delayed, a day to day explanation; timely submission is required to permit Board and Law Ministry processing and legal clearance prior to filing.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.