Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Circulars
of of All Circulars
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Private companies can't bypass section 284 by adding extra director removal grounds; must act in a general meeting.</h1> A private company cannot bypass the provisions of section 284 by adding extra grounds in its articles for directors' vacation of office, as outlined in section 283(3). If these additional grounds effectively lead to a director's removal, such action must be taken by the company in a general meeting, as required by section 284. Any authority granted to the board of directors in this regard would be legally ineffective due to section 9.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
