Time-limit for s.269D proceedings: generally complete within two years; delays require recorded reasons and supervisory review. No statutory time-limit exists for proceedings under Chapter XXa initiated by notice under section 269D; the Board directs expeditious completion, ordinarily within two years, and requires recording of reasons for delays with Commissioner review of their validity, and that Competent Authorities be instructed to ensure compliance.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Time-limit for s.269D proceedings: generally complete within two years; delays require recorded reasons and supervisory review.
No statutory time-limit exists for proceedings under Chapter XXa initiated by notice under section 269D; the Board directs expeditious completion, ordinarily within two years, and requires recording of reasons for delays with Commissioner review of their validity, and that Competent Authorities be instructed to ensure compliance.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
