Capital goods credit denied for ceramic flooring tiles not treated as refractory materials under excise rules.

Ceramic tiles used in a factory for flooring and wall purposes were held not to be refractory materials, so they did not qualify as capital goods eligible for credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The operative test was the actual use and character of the goods: flooring and wall tiles did not fall within the specified capital goods categories. Credit on the ceramic tiles was therefore not admissible, and the appeal was rejected.

---

---

Issues: Whether ceramic tiles used in the factory for flooring could be treated as refractory materials and qualify for credit as capital goods under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.

Analysis: The ceramic tiles were admitted to have been used for flooring and wall purposes in the factory. Such use did not support their characterisation as refractory materials, and the goods did not fall within the specified capital goods categories eligible for credit.

Conclusion: The credit was not admissible on the ceramic tiles and the appeal was rejected.

---