Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the penalty imposed for non-entry of goods in the RG 1 register was sustainable and, if so, to what extent it should be reduced.
Analysis: The Tribunal declined to entertain the grounds relating to the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998, as refusal to extend the benefit of that scheme was not appealable. On the only surviving issue, the Tribunal took into account the nature of the fabrics, the duty payable on them, and the explanation that the goods were not ready for despatch and had not been removed from the factory.
Conclusion: The penalty was held to be excessive and was reduced from Rs. 2,45,310 to Rs. 2,00,000, while the rest of the order was confirmed.