CEGAT Mumbai dismisses modification application citing financial hardship not raised earlier. Extension granted to deposit amount by July 31, 2000. The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai dismissed the application for modification of its order due to financial hardship not being raised earlier. The ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
CEGAT Mumbai dismisses modification application citing financial hardship not raised earlier. Extension granted to deposit amount by July 31, 2000.
The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai dismissed the application for modification of its order due to financial hardship not being raised earlier. The applicant was given an extension to deposit the amount until July 31, 2000, with compliance to be reported by August 8, 2000.
The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai dismissed the application for modification of its order due to financial hardship not being raised earlier. The applicant was given an extension to deposit the amount until July 31, 2000, with compliance to be reported by August 8, 2000. (2000 (6) TMI 477 - CEGAT, Mumbai)
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.