Appeal Dismissed & Restoration Denied Due to Non-Compliance with Deposit Order The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai was dismissed for failure to comply with the deposit order within the specified timeframe. The ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appeal Dismissed & Restoration Denied Due to Non-Compliance with Deposit Order
The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai was dismissed for failure to comply with the deposit order within the specified timeframe. The application for restoration was also denied as the deposit made in 1999 did not align with the stay order, with the Tribunal emphasizing the importance of upholding its orders and maintaining their sanctity.
The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai dismissed the appeal due to failure to comply with the order for deposit within two months of Rs. 45,000. The application for restoration was also dismissed as the deposit made in 1999 did not comply with the stay order. The Tribunal stated that restoring the appeal would undermine its orders and sanctity. Application for restoration was dismissed.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.