Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Revenue's application for reference of the question regarding eligibility of Modvat credit on Dandy Covers, Dryer Felt, Press Felt, Industrial Cloth and Synthetic Wire as inputs used in paper-making machinery should be allowed.
Analysis: The question of admissibility of credit on the disputed items was not decided by the Patna High Court in the earlier decision relied upon, which dealt with limitation and the interaction between Section 11A and Rule 57I. Since the present dispute raised a distinct question on whether the items, being replaceable attachments used as parts of the machinery in the manufacture of paper, fell within the Modvat scheme or stood excluded by the explanation to Rule 57A, and similar matters had already been referred in other cases, the application disclosed a fit question for reference.
Conclusion: The reference application was allowed and the question of law was referred to the High Court.