Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the question of law regarding the eligibility of felts and wire nettings as inputs under Rule 57A required reference to the High Court.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that it had already allowed the assessee's appeal in an earlier order by holding that felts and wire nettings used in the manufacture of paper were inputs within the meaning of Rule 57A. It also noted that, in a similar matter, the question had been referred to the jurisdictional High Court. Following that course, the Tribunal found it appropriate to refer the present question to the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court and directed preparation of the statement of the case.
Conclusion: The question was referred to the jurisdictional High Court for opinion.
Final Conclusion: The matter was disposed of by making a reference on the identified question of law, without any fresh adjudication on the substantive eligibility issue.