Tariff classification of tar and pitch depends on manufacture, blending, and commercial character under the excise schedule.

Classification under the Central Excise Tariff turned on the actual nature and manufacture of the goods. Road tar and special tar, being tar distillates obtained from coal, remained classifiable as tar under Heading 2706.00 rather than as pitch under Sub-heading 2708.11. Soft pitch, obtained without blending with creosote oil or any coal tar distillate, fell in the residual pitch entry under Sub-heading 2708.19. Hard pitch and extra hard pitch, being blended and aerated products, were covered by Sub-heading 2708.11. The stated principle is that tariff classification depends on manufacturing process, commercial character, and the specific wording of the competing entries.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether road tar and special tar were classifiable under Heading 2706.00 or Sub-heading 2708.11 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; (ii) Whether soft pitch was classifiable under Sub-heading 2708.11 or Sub-heading 2708.19 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; (iii) Whether hard pitch and extra hard pitch were classifiable under Sub-heading 2708.11 or Sub-heading 2708.19 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.

Issue (i): Whether road tar and special tar were classifiable under Heading 2706.00 or Sub-heading 2708.11 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.

Analysis: The goods described as road tar and special tar were found to be tar distillates obtained from coal. The tariff description and HSN-based understanding treated such products as reconstituted tars, while the material did not support their treatment as pitch merely because they were used in road surfacing or were referred to in trade by different names. On the facts recorded, the broader tar heading remained applicable and the specific pitch heading was not attracted.

Conclusion: Road tar and special tar were correctly classifiable under Heading 2706.00 and not under Sub-heading 2708.11.

Issue (ii): Whether soft pitch was classifiable under Sub-heading 2708.11 or Sub-heading 2708.19 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.

Analysis: Soft pitch was recorded as being obtained without blending with creosote oil or any coal tar distillate. Sub-heading 2708.11 covered blended pitch, whereas the unblended residue fell within the residual pitch entry. The classification therefore turned on the absence of blending in the manufacturing process.

Conclusion: Soft pitch was classifiable under Sub-heading 2708.19 and not under Sub-heading 2708.11.

Issue (iii): Whether hard pitch and extra hard pitch were classifiable under Sub-heading 2708.11 or Sub-heading 2708.19 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.

Analysis: Hard pitch and extra hard pitch were found to be blended and aerated products. Since Sub-heading 2708.11 applied to blended pitch, the manufacturing process brought these goods within that entry and excluded them from the residual pitch heading.

Conclusion: Hard pitch and extra hard pitch were correctly classifiable under Sub-heading 2708.11 and not under Sub-heading 2708.19.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only to the limited extent of soft pitch, while the classification of road tar, special tar, hard pitch, and extra hard pitch was sustained in accordance with the impugned order.

Ratio Decidendi: Classification depends on the actual manufacture and commercial character of the goods, and where a tariff entry covers blended pitch specifically, unblended pitch falls in the residual entry while tar distillates obtained from coal remain classifiable as tar.

---