Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the electromagnetic vibrating feeder and its exciter/magnetic unit were correctly classifiable under Heading 8479 rather than Heading 8505 under the Central Excise Tariff.
Analysis: The device was examined on the basis of its application and operation, which showed that it discharged bulk solids by vibration and functioned as a mechanical device rather than as an electro-magnet or electrical appliance. The literature relating to the product was treated as the proper material for understanding its technical character. On that basis, and applying Note 2(b) of Section XVI of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, the device, being not elsewhere classified, was held to fall under Heading 8479. The exciter unit or magnetic unit was also treated as a part of the same machine and classified accordingly.
Conclusion: The classification under Heading 8479 was upheld, and the Revenue's challenge to classification under Heading 8505 failed.