Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the ex parte dismissal of the appeal and the direction to make pre-deposit without affording a hearing violated the principles of natural justice, and whether the matter deserved waiver of pre-deposit, stay, and remand for fresh consideration.
Analysis: The order of the Commissioner (Appeals) was passed ex parte without granting the appellants an opportunity of hearing in the stay petition. The Tribunal noted that such a procedure amounted to a gross violation of the principles of natural justice and that similar ex parte disposal had been deprecated. In the circumstances, the requirement of pre-deposit was dispensed with and stay was granted. The appeal was then sent back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for decision afresh after hearing the appellants.
Conclusion: The ex parte order could not be sustained. Pre-deposit was waived, stay was granted, and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh disposal after hearing the appellants.