Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty proceedings against the directors could be continued after the principal noticee company settled the dispute under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme.
Analysis: The settlement of the dispute by the principal noticee under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme was treated as extending immunity to other co-noticees. As the respondents were only directors of the company and the company had already availed of the scheme, the penalty proceedings against them were not sustainable.
Conclusion: The penalty imposed on the directors was correctly dropped, and the Revenue's appeals failed.