Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether import of sodium saccharin under a transferred value based advance licence could be denied exemption on the ground that the sensitive-item norm in the Handbook limited import to 2% by weight or quantity.
Analysis: The licence was a value based advance licence and did not prescribe any specific quantity restriction for sodium saccharin. The Handbook norms for sensitive items were intended to guide the licensing authority in computing the CIF value and entitlement under the licence. A sensitive-item entry does not, by itself, impose an independent bar on import unless the licence expressly makes quantity a limiting factor for that item. Since the licence showed no such limitation for sodium saccharin, and the department did not establish any contrary basis from the licence or DEEC book, the exemption could not be denied.
Conclusion: The denial of exemption was not justified and the appeal failed.
Final Conclusion: The import remained eligible for the benefit of the notification under the terms of the value based advance licence, and the order allowing exemption was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: In a value based advance licence, a sensitive-item norm in the Handbook affects entitlement computation only to the extent reflected in the licence; customs authorities cannot deny exemption on an implied quantity restriction not expressly contained in the licence.