Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether waiver of pre-deposit of duty was justified on a prima facie view that the disputed components and spares were eligible for Modvat credit as capital goods or eligible inputs.
Analysis: The dispute concerned components and spares classified under chapter headings other than those specifically covered by the definition of capital goods, but used with capital goods falling under the relevant chapters. The Board's Circular No. 276/110/96-TRU dated 02-12-1996 clarified that parts, components and accessories used with capital goods of the specified clauses were eligible for Modvat credit. On that basis, the Tribunal found a prima facie case in favour of the applicants and held that the balance of convenience supported waiver of pre-deposit for hearing of the appeal.
Conclusion: Waiver of pre-deposit was granted in favour of the applicants.