Prima facie waiver of pre-deposit granted where disputed Modvat inputs were treated as substantially matching and recovery stayed.

A prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit was found in relation to disputed Modvat credit and penalty, so recovery was stayed at the interim stage. The alleged mismatch in photo polymer films was treated as only a minor variation between the declared input and the goods received, and was not taken as a basis to deny credit for pre-deposit purposes. Alumina ceramic substrate was similarly regarded as substantially matching the declared item. The unchallenged limitation submission, together with the fact that the demand was worked out from statutory documents, supported dispensing with pre-deposit of the disputed amounts, while the admitted amount was directed to be deposited.

---

---

Issues: Whether a prima facie case existed for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in respect of the disputed Modvat credit and penalty.

Analysis: The disputed credit relating to photo polymer films was held, at the prima facie stage, to involve only a minor variation between the declared input and the received goods, and was not treated as a ground to deny credit. As regards alumina ceramic substrate, the declared item and the received item were similarly treated as substantially matching for the limited purpose of pre-deposit. The unchallenged submission on limitation also supported the view that the demand, being worked out on the basis of statutory documents, did not justify insisting on pre-deposit at that stage.

Conclusion: A prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit was made out; pre-deposit of the disputed credit and penalty was dispensed with and recovery was stayed, while the admitted amount was directed to be deposited.

---