Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the clearances of the three units were required to be clubbed for the purpose of exemption under Notification No. 16/97-CE, and whether further pre-deposit of duty and penalty was required pending appeal.
Analysis: The dispute turned on whether the three units were independent manufacturers or were operating in a manner warranting clubbing of their clearances for exemption purposes. The Applicants had already made deposits towards duty and had also complied with the pre-deposit requirement in respect of penalty as directed by the appellate authority. In view of the competing factual positions and the existing deposits, the question of clubbing was treated as one requiring adjudication at the final hearing, and no further pre-deposit was considered necessary.
Conclusion: Further pre-deposit of the remaining duty and penalty was waived, and recovery of the same was stayed during the pendency of the appeals.