Condonation of delay in Modvat declarations: a revised filing and request for acceptance satisfied the rule, defeating credit denial and penalty.

A revised declaration filed within three months of receipt of capital goods was treated as a valid request for condonation of delay under Rule 57-T(3), because the words asking that the declaration "may please be accepted" showed an intention that any delay be excused and the declaration admitted. The absence of a formal rejection of the declaration also supported that view. On that basis, the requirement of a request for condonation was held to be satisfied, and denial of Modvat credit and the associated penalty were not sustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether a revised declaration filed within three months, accompanied by a request that the declaration be accepted, could be treated as an application for condonation of delay under Rule 57-T(3), and whether denial of Modvat credit and penalty was justified.

Analysis: The revised declaration was filed within three months from the dates of receipt of the capital goods. The request that the declaration "may please be accepted" was treated as a request for condonation of delay, since its purpose and intention were that any delay be excused and the declaration be accepted. The absence of a formal rejection of the declaration also supported this view. On that basis, the requirement of a request for condonation under the rule was held to be satisfied.

Conclusion: The request was a valid application for condonation of delay, and the denial of Modvat credit and imposition of penalty were not sustainable.

Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief according to law.

---