Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported "Nylo print plate processing equipment" was classifiable under Customs Tariff Heading 84.34 or Customs Tariff Heading 90.10.
Analysis: The adjudicating authority had found that the equipment worked on the photographic principle and classified it under Customs Tariff Heading 90.10. That finding was not reversed by the lower appellate authority, and the revenue's contention on the same footing remained uncontested. The larger bench decision in Light Publications Ltd. was applied, which held that where equipment works on the photographic principle, classification falls under Customs Tariff Heading 90.10.
Conclusion: The imported equipment was correctly classifiable under Customs Tariff Heading 90.10, and the revenue's appeal succeeds.
Ratio Decidendi: In a classification dispute between Customs Tariff Heading 84.34 and Customs Tariff Heading 90.10, equipment working on the photographic principle falls under Customs Tariff Heading 90.10.