Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether parts of storage batteries cleared under Notification No. 68/86-CE were entitled to exemption when used in the manufacture of stationary batteries at another factory after Chapter X procedure.
Analysis: The notification granted exemption to parts of storage batteries only when used in the factory of production for manufacture of storage batteries. The record showed that the cleared parts were used for manufacture of stationary batteries at another manufacturer's premises. The distinction between storage batteries and stationary batteries was accepted on the evidence before the appellate authority, and the exemption notification was held to require strict construction without importing an intended equivalence between the two categories. The plea that the parts should qualify under the alternative entry for stationary batteries was rejected because the declared classification and the factual clearance did not establish manufacture of parts of stationary batteries.
Conclusion: The exemption was not available to the appellants, and the demand was sustained.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed and the order denying exemption and confirming duty was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: An exemption notification must be construed strictly, and parts exempted for use in the manufacture of storage batteries do not automatically qualify when used in the manufacture of a different battery category at another factory.