Invoice validity under Rule 57GG upheld where dealer details were recorded and mistaken Modvat credit was reversed; penalty set aside.

Penalty on a dealer for issuing an invoice under Rule 57GG was found unwarranted where the invoice contained the dealer's registration particulars, was entered in RG-23D, and was issued to a third party. The presence of the factory address on the invoice did not invalidate it, and the manufacturer's mistaken Modvat credit entry was later reversed. As the authorities made no adverse finding on the availability of credit and the issue was confined to penalty, the penalty was set aside.

---

---

Issues: Whether penalty was sustainable against the dealer for issuance of invoice under Rule 57GG of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 when the invoice bore the dealer's registration particulars and the factory's mistaken availment of Modvat credit was later reversed.

Analysis: The dealer and the manufacturing unit were situated in the same , but the invoice had been entered in the dealer's RG-23D records and was issued by the dealer to a third party. The mere presence of the factory address on the invoice, along with the dealer's registration number and permanent income-tax account number, did not render the invoice invalid. The mistaken credit entry was made by the manufacturer in its own Modvat records and was subsequently reversed. There was no finding by the authorities below on the availability or otherwise of Modvat credit; the only issue was the penalty imposed on the dealer.

Conclusion: The penalty was not justified or warranted and was set aside.

---