Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported product described as liquid flowmeter was classifiable under Chapter Heading 90.26 or as a liquid meter under sub-heading 9028.20.
Analysis: The classification dispute turned on whether the instrument measured flow of liquid per unit of time or merely the total volume delivered over a period. The description in the invoice and bill of entry referred to a flowmeter, but the manufacturer's catalogue identified the model and described it as used for volumetric measurement of liquids. The catalogue was found more reliable than the invoice description. The HSN notes under Section XVIII distinguished flowmeters from liquid meters and treated apparatus that merely indicates the total amount of liquid delivered over a period as falling under Heading 90.28. As the product was not shown to be designed or calibrated to measure flow per unit of time, it was treated as a liquid meter.
Conclusion: The product was held classifiable under sub-heading 9028.20 and not under Chapter Heading 90.26, in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: For tariff classification, the instrument must be classified according to its essential function as shown by reliable material such as the manufacturer's catalogue and the HSN notes, and an apparatus measuring only volumetric delivery over time is not a flowmeter merely because it is described as such in the invoice.