Appeal reassigned to different Bench due to bias concerns. The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai ordered the appeal to be heard by a different Bench due to the awareness of the executive Commissioner, Member ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appeal reassigned to different Bench due to bias concerns.
The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai ordered the appeal to be heard by a different Bench due to the awareness of the executive Commissioner, Member (Technical) of the Asstt. Commissioner's mindset during the order-in-original. (1999 (11) TMI 417 - CEGAT, Mumbai)
The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai found that the executive Commissioner, Member (Technical) was aware of the mind of the Asstt. Commissioner when the order-in-original was made. This could have influenced the appeal process, so the appeal was to be placed before a different Bench. (1999 (11) TMI 417 - CEGAT, Mumbai)
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.