Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under Section 114A of the Customs Act, 1962 could be imposed on the holder of the import licence, or only on the person liable to pay duty on imported goods under Section 28(2) of the Customs Act, 1962.
Analysis: The dispute arose from denial of exemption under Notification No. 203/92-Cus. and the consequential penalty imposed on the licence holder. The provision was construed on its plain language, which linked penal liability under Section 114A to the person who is liable to pay duty under Section 28(2). The appellant, being only the licence holder, did not fall within the class of persons on whom such penalty could be imposed.
Conclusion: Penalty under Section 114A was not imposable on the appellant licence holder and was therefore liable to be set aside.