Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether saltpetre manufactured synthetically was covered by Notification No. 263/88 dated 06.10.1988 so as to entitle the assessee to exemption and Modvat credit.
Analysis: The notification exempted saltpetre falling within Chapters 25, 28 or 38 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 from the whole of the duty of excise. Its explanation used inclusive language and stated that, for the purpose of the notification, saltpetre includes rasi, sajji, all substances manufactured from saline earth, kherinum, and every form of sulphate or carbonate of soda. The inclusive wording showed that the exemption was not confined to one method of manufacture. Since the product was treated as saltpetre and the explanation extended to saltpetre manufactured by any process, the goods remained within the scope of the notification.
Conclusion: The product was covered by the exemption notification and the assessee was not entitled to succeed on the claim of non-exemption.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed and the departmental view that the product was exempt under the notification was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: An exemption notification with an inclusive definition extends to all forms of the specified commodity covered by the explanatory language, including goods manufactured by different processes, unless the notification clearly excludes them.