Pre-deposit refund and delayed retention interest apply once the underlying excise order is set aside.

A pre-deposit made under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act had to be returned to the assessee once the adjudication order was set aside, and the amount could not be diverted to RG-23A Part II credit because it was not a duty-payment document. The retained sum was also required to be refunded within three months of the Tribunal's final order; failure to do so made the continued retention unlawful for the delay period and attracted interest at 12% per annum until payment.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the amount deposited under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was liable to be returned to the appellant without being diverted to any credit adjustment. (ii) Whether interest was payable on the amount retained beyond the period allowed for refund.

Issue (i): Whether the amount deposited under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was liable to be returned to the appellant without being diverted to any credit adjustment.

Analysis: The deposit was made pursuant to the Tribunal's order and, after the adjudication order had been set aside, the amount belonged to the appellant. The direction requiring the appellant to take credit in RG-23A Part II was held to be unwarranted, as credit could be taken only against duty-paying documents and the deposited amount was not to be saddled with any such liability.

Conclusion: The amount of Rs. 10 lakhs was required to be returned to the appellant, and the departmental credit adjustment direction was not accepted.

Issue (ii): Whether interest was payable on the amount retained beyond the period allowed for refund.

Analysis: The amount ought to have been returned within three months after the Tribunal's final order setting aside the adjudication. Since the refund was not made within that period, the retention was treated as unlawful for the delayed period.

Conclusion: Interest at 12% per annum was directed on the retained amount for the period of delay until payment.

Final Conclusion: The appellant succeeded in securing refund of the deposited amount with interest for delayed retention.

Ratio Decidendi: A pre-deposit ordered under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 must be returned to the assessee once the order requiring it is set aside, and unjustified retention beyond the permissible period entitles the assessee to interest.

---