Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicants were entitled to unconditional waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty in view of their prima facie challenge to the demand raised under Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules.
Analysis: The demand of duty on pressmud and baggasse was challenged as being contrary to Rule 57CC. The Tribunal found the contention prima facie correct, noting that the applicants had established a strong prima facie case against the duty demand. Since the penalty was consequential to the duty demand, a strong prima facie case was also made out against the penalty. In these circumstances, the request for insisting upon deposit of the full amounts was not accepted.
Conclusion: The applicants were held entitled to unconditional waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty.