Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether parts and accessories of a crane, when the crane is treated as capital goods, are covered under clause (b) of the explanation to Rule 57Q.
Analysis: The issue was treated as settled in favour of treating a crane as capital goods. On that basis, the parts and accessories of such capital goods were held to fall within clause (b) of the explanation to Rule 57Q. The appellate order had already analysed the matter correctly, and no infirmity was found in that reasoning.
Conclusion: The parts and accessories of the crane were covered under Rule 57Q, and the appeal was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Once an item is held to be capital goods, its parts and accessories are also entitled to the benefit available under the relevant Modvat provision covering capital goods.