Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Assistant Collector's order directing provisional assessment and calling for bond was an appealable order.
Analysis: Rule 173C empowered the proper officer to modify the value declared by the assessee so as to conform to Section 4, and, where enquiry was considered necessary, to direct provisional assessment and require execution of bond under Rule 9B. The assessee had failed to furnish the required documents and information, and the order of the Assistant Collector showed application of the statutory requirements. An order made in exercise of such a statutory discretion could not be equated with a general adjudicatory order merely because it affected the assessee. The expression "any decision or order" in the appellate provision had to be read narrowly, and an order directing provisional assessment did not fall within its ambit.
Conclusion: The Assistant Collector's order was not appealable, and the Revenue's appeal succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: An order directing provisional assessment under Rule 173C and Rule 9B, made on the proper officer's statutory satisfaction that enquiry is required, is not an appealable order merely because it affects the assessee.